Wonder Woman 1984 Is A Flawed Attempt To Do Something Great. See It.

By

I recently watched Wonder Woman (2017), and Wonder Woman 1984 (2020), both starring Gal Gadot.

I remember when these movies came out. Everybody liked Wonder Woman, and most people did not like Wonder Woman 1984.

Both of these movies have their share of silliness, and I admit that the first movie, Wonder Woman, stands up better.

But even though Wonder Woman 1984 has some big things going against it, including a villain who is transparently a stand-in for Donald Trump (cheap shot, Hollywood), and some anti-wealth overtones, it has one surprisingly important thing in its favor: the theme is the danger of wishful thinking. It's a metaphysical theme. What's more, it's a true theme.

The movie is a morality tale that uses a physical artifact to symbolize the human temptation to long for what is not over what is. In the movie, the artifact, in granting wishes, always exacts a hidden cost. It's hard not to salute such a well-conceived device to dramatize the theme that wishing is dangerous, and committing to a wish is evil.

"The secret of all their esoteric philosophies, of all their dialectics and super-senses, of their evasive eyes and snarling words, the secret for which they destroy civilization, language, industries and lives, the secret for which they pierce their own eyes and eardrums, grind out their senses, blank out their minds, the purpose for which they dissolve the absolutes of reason, logic, matter, existence, reality—is to erect upon that plastic fog a single holy absolute: their wish." —Ayn Rand

Wonder Woman 1984 dramatizes (symbolically) that in this world, there is much to enjoy, learn, and gain if only one renounces one's wish for an alternative.

All in all, I think Wonder Woman 1984 really doesn't deserve such a bad rap. Yes, it has a paper-thin villain (who is, nonetheless extremely well-played by Pedro Pascal. He's enjoyable to watch.). Yes, it needlessly pokes fun at the financial optimism of the 1980's. There are some silly moments, as well as some very enjoyable ones. But mainly, the movie's message makes it worth tolerating the weaknesses.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should You Want To Live?

By
Should you want to live? Read that again. Should  you want to live? It's not an obvious question. It's a fishy  question. For Ayn Rand, the purpose of morality is enjoyment, long-range, i.e. life. The whole problem of morality is that we often want to do things that are bad for that goal . Moral thinking helps us discover the ideas and the courses of action that further our interest , as opposed to our immediate pleasure or satisfaction. If you don't want to live, then, according to Objectivism, moral arguments are irrelevant, because you've given up what moral argumentation  appeals to: the desire for durable joy . The choice to live is pre-moral. Morality is about how to live. Choose to live—to pursue happiness—then we can talk about morality. Some think that because "man's life" is the standard of morality in Objectivism, bare survival is all that Objectivist morality involves. They hold that any desire for happiness above bare survival, according t
Read more

Open and Closed Objectivism

By
People remain confused regarding whether or not Objectivism is an "open system" of philosophy. Many people don't understand the issue (hint: it has nothing to do with copyright). The confusion is because people on both sides represent the issue differently.  The people on the "open" side claim the issue regards the freedom to innovate and integrate ideas. They hold that to close Objectivism means that any hidden errors in it should be preserved and adhered to; that closing Objectivism means stopping or at least impeding philosophic progress within Objectivism.  The people on the "closed" side claim the issue regards Objectivism's integrity and identity. They hold that opening Objectivism means that Ayn Rand's ideas may be undermined by philosophic inflation—the introduction of counterfeit Objectivism. They also claim that those who want to open Objectivism wish to increase the stature of their own ideas by calling them part of Objectivism.  Who
Read more

What Is Freedom?

By
"Freedom" is a term used to mean many different things, even when limited to the political context. To some, freedom means the ability to speak one's mind in public without being put in jail. To others, freedom means having affordable health-care, and gainful employment. To still others, freedom means the ability to take over the media or make demonstrations that disrupt private functions. However it is defined, freedom is something that all people want, and believe they deserve. This makes the term particularly valuable to politicians. By advocating "freedom," they can promise to satisfy each person's desire—while evading the fact that the desires of people often conflict. Why Define Freedom? Why define any term? To have a clear understanding of it, and to assure that people understand each other when they use it to communicate. When a term is misunderstood, confusion occurs, and bad things can result, ranging from hurt feelings to broken promises, to wars.
Read more