How Evil Operates: Review of "Dr. Death"

By

In order to understand human nature fully, we need accurate portrayals of unexcused human evil.

Today, all too frequently, we see dramatic antagonists motivated by a malevolence explained by early-life circumstances. What we don't see nearly as often are villains explained by nothing other than their own errors of thought, and their unwavering, unyielding commitment to those errors despite nearly overwhelming evidence.

The evil man's mantra is: "There is no way I'm wrong about this." The evil man cannot (without great personal cost) admit his own error. The degree of evil is the importance of the uncorrected error.

Self-deception is the act of accepting a false belief which serves to flatter one's own image or situation. It can be as minor as "I'll call him back tomorrow" when one actually has no such intention, or as major as "He deserved to die" after committing a murder. It can be as modest as "I have more important things to do" to get out of an unpleasant task, or as grand as "I'm more than human" in excusing virtually every transgression against actual humans. Persistent, unwavering, uncorrected self-deception is the essence of evil. It's the hallmark of an evil soul.

Hubris, or conceitedness, is to uphold a false, favorable image of oneself. Hubris is a necessary attribute of evil. Evil cannot face itself as such. It paints itself as virtue.

I just finished watching Dr. Death on Peacock, NBC's streaming service. It's based on a true story, so its value is not in the plot.

The value of Dr. Death is in its convincing portrayal of real evil, and the inspiring portrayal of those who fight it. This is not melodrama, where the evil is so exaggerated that we can feel safe about it. This is drama, where the evil was real, and where we can relate to it, if not in degree, in method.

We are always making errors. The issue is, how fundamental are those errors, and do we seek to correct them, or do we uphold them because we cannot face a world in which we have erred?

In Dr. Death, Joshua Jackson (as Surgeon Christopher Duntsch) convincingly shows us how evil operates (pun honestly completely unintended—really).

Christian Slater and Alec Baldwin do a great job portraying the heroic surgeons who seek to stop him.

AnnaSophia Robb convincingly portrays the heroic assistant district attorney who builds the case against Duntsch.

Carrie Preston plays Duntsch's defense attorney, who comes across to me as likeable and sympathetic.

Dr. Death is an enlightening pageant of characters, some heroic, some mixed, and one horribly depraved.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reality

By
I'm an Objectivist. What does that mean? It means that my fundamental belief is in reality. It also means a lot of other things, but that's the main thing. It also means that most people on Earth disagree with me. Some people believe in reality but say a supreme being created it and could change it whenever he wishes. That means their fundamental belief is in the supreme being — not reality. Others claim it's naïve or dangerous to attempt to say anything about "a reality" we all share, especially that we all share it. With these people, whenever you say "reality" they feel the need to ask "Whose reality?" as if there can be no reality that is not a personal attribute. They take comfort in believing that their reality is not mine. People who disagree with me think "a reality" belongs to someone. They think that "each reality," as such, is created by its owner. That's the idea I firmly reject. Instead, I hold that reality
Read more

Mission Unphysical

By
Image
In a famous scene from the first of Tom Cruise's  Mission Impossible  movies, disavowed CIA agent Franz Krieger uses a harness, a carabiner, and four pulleys (one of them is arguably better called a "pushey") and rope to lower agent Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) through the ceiling of a room at CIA headquarters in order to steal something. It's a fun and suspenseful scene to watch, but here I want to talk about how silly this pulley system is. Franz is lying down in a narrow air duct above the vent through which he is lowering Ethan. The vent is near his feet, and he's slowly releasing line through a pulley (kept out of sight) that is mounted above him, and closer to the hole. From that pulley, the line comes back toward him, through a pulley that is attached with a carabiner to a harness on his chest. The line then goes back toward the hole, but up again to a different (visible) high-mounted pulley, then it descends toward the hole and over a "pushey" mounted
Read more

Open and Closed Objectivism

By
People remain confused regarding whether or not Objectivism is an "open system" of philosophy. Many people don't understand the issue (hint: it has nothing to do with copyright). The confusion is because people on both sides represent the issue differently.  The people on the "open" side claim the issue regards the freedom to innovate and integrate ideas. They hold that to close Objectivism means that any hidden errors in it should be preserved and adhered to; that closing Objectivism means stopping or at least impeding philosophic progress within Objectivism.  The people on the "closed" side claim the issue regards Objectivism's integrity and identity. They hold that opening Objectivism means that Ayn Rand's ideas may be undermined by philosophic inflation—the introduction of counterfeit Objectivism. They also claim that those who want to open Objectivism wish to increase the stature of their own ideas by calling them part of Objectivism.  Who
Read more